|
ADAM SMITH'S MONEY GAME
Transcript #104
Air Date: May 8, 1998
Missed the show?
Get a phone call half way through? Fail to catch the name of a stock in
"Personal Best"? In case you did, we are happy to provide you with a
transcript. If you would like a transcript from a previous season, please
visit 800-All-News at www.800-all-news.com or call them at (800)
All-News.
ANNOUNCER: [voice over] This program is made possible by a
grant from MetLife, helping people become financially secure for 130
years. Funding has also been provided by the Roy R. and Marie S.
Neuberger Foundation.
ADAM SMITH: [voice over] In the Money Game this week, can
Bob Pittman make AOL the next Microsoft? Will these images of
America make you choose RC Cola? Does book selling on the Web
spell the end of the bookstore? Can small cap stocks in your 401(k)
help you do your personal best? Find out next.
Face to Face
ADAM SMITH: Hello, I'm Adam Smith and welcome to The Money
Game. Is America Online the next Microsoft? Just a year ago, no one
would have taken that question seriously. Now AOL is the hot
company in the super hot Internet world. It's been called the Hertz of
cyberspace with no Avis to challenge.
ANNOUNCER: [excerpt from America Online commercial] Why is
America on America Online?
ADAM SMITH: [voice over] AOL operators are signing up
thousands of new members each day and the company is making
money by providing computer links to retailers. Can AOL stay on a
roll?
Bob Pittman, the man who made MTV a household word, is in charge
of building the brand. Meet Bob Pittman, Face to Face.
BOB PITTMAN: I happen to think, but it's my background, that
brands win. I keep on my desk a can of Coca-Cola because whenever
people get all worked up about this new functionality they have, I
remind them Coca-Cola does not win the taste test. Microsoft
Windows is not the best operating system. We live in America; brands
win.
ADAM SMITH: With more than 12 million subscribers paying a
monthly fee of more than $20, America Online has emerged as the
winning online consumer brand. It allows users to send e-mail, chat,
follow their stocks, get the news, play games and buy things without
leaving their desks. It is even starting to keep people away from that
other glowing screen _ the tube.
BOB PITTMAN: This is the first product that has taken time from the
TV set in the household. And having done six cable networks, I do
understand how important the TV set is. The TV set was so important
people took time from eating to make more time for TV. They moved
their dining room table in front of the TV so they could eat and watch
TV. For something to steal time from the TV set _ it's really the first
time in the history of television this has happened _ says it's a very
powerful product.
ADAM SMITH: [voice over] Wall Street is recognizing the power,
sending AOL's stock price on a tear over the past 18 months.
[on camera] Your stock has been a star _ $18 billion in market value,
nine times revenues. What do you have to do to justify this price to
Wall Street?
BOB PITTMAN: As I look at it, we're essentially a high operating
leverage business. We've passed break-even. High operating leverage
is terrible when you're losing money, great when you're making money.
This is a business that doesn't manage itself but is manageable, meaning
that my goal as a manager is to try and keep expenses from rising as
fast as the rate of revenue, keep a little lower ramp rate, keep our
margin whole in the variable part of the business. If we do and the
market grows like it does and we continue to do well, there's a
tremendous upside. And I think the analyst's job is to try and calculate
how big that is.
I learned an important lesson at MTV. We built it for $30 million. It
was sold for half a billion, thinking what a wild price. Today it's worth
$8-, $10-, $12 billion? You tell me.
ADAM SMITH: What about other forms of competition? The
telephone companies? They have deep pockets? And the cable
companies? All of these people already have wires into the houses.
BOB PITTMAN: I think if you think competition, you have to think
where are we getting our usage from? Where are we getting our
members' time from? Where are we getting our advertising dollars?
And it's really the television business for the most part. Most of the
usage we're getting is coming from TV time, so I have to be focused
and say we're competing with them every day, every night. When you
think about advertising, they've got the advertising dollars. We're doing
well _ we're small.
If you look at the facts and figures, the ratings. We are up to now, our
prime time simultaneous users are now approaching the size of CNBC,
CNN, the cable players not yet at ABC, NBC, CBS. We have a long
way to go. I think it's real easy for a company like ours to get distracted
and say ``Let's just talk about other technology companies'' and we
miss the real market we're playing in. And the real potential of this
market is to be important in the home like the telephone and the
television.
ADAM SMITH: [voice over] Bob Pittman joined AOL about a year
ago at the urging of Steve Case, the company's founder and CEO.
Pittman had been at Century 21, the real estate company. Before that,
he ran a division for Time Warner.
Bob Pittman is best known as an early player in the success of MTV.
He helped build that cable channel into a pop culture juggernaut,
parlaying a career in radio that began when most people his age were
hitting the books. Like some other entrepreneurs _ Bill Gates, for
example _ Bob Pittman dropped out of college to go to work.
BOB PITTMAN: My last year was supposed to be at the University
of Chicago. I never showed up. I decided I'd wait out a semester and I
guess I'm still waiting out that semester.
ADAM SMITH: Do you think you missed anything?
BOB PITTMAN: I think you really give up something by not taking
that experience. I find I've learned a lot of things later in life that my
friends learned in college. So I gave up a part of my development as an
adult and deferred it in an effort to work a little harder earlier.
ADAM SMITH: [voice over] At AOL, Pittman brings media and
marketing savvy to a business that can be very techy.
[on camera] Can you give me your vision for AOL in five years?
BOB PITTMAN: The vision is that we continue to get embedded in
people's lives, meaning we perform an important function; that the
computer becomes as important in their lives as their television and their
telephone; that the usage continues to grow; that we continue to eat into
that seven hours a day the family spends with the TV set _ sorry _ and
spends that time on AOL. And the service gets easier and easier and
easier.
We're not yet at instant-on TV. And if you think about how easy it is to
have to get, it should get that easy.
ADAM SMITH: Like a telephone?
BOB PITTMAN: Like a telephone, like a television. You know, it's
funny, when we're talking programming, we try not to kid ourselves.
And we say first, is this important in someone's life? Yes. The next
question is, is this really easier than the alternative?
For example, there is a possibility to use AOL phone now. You know,
you talk to somebody else. The reality is it's really easier just to pick up
the phone and call somebody. So you say that's probably_ on the other
hand, let's take e-mail. For me to write a letter, find the address, write
it, put a stamp, go mail it, that's a lot more work than sending an e-mail.
E-mail _ killer. It's great.
Chatting _ the same thing. You know, for me to get dressed, go out,
where am I going, drive somewhere. Or I can just talk here to people,
not perhaps as robust an experience, but a lot more convenient, you
begin to look and be able to predict which applications are probably
going to do really well on line and which aren't.
ADAM SMITH: Well, what will do well on line?
BOB PITTMAN: Do you ever get pictures developed and try and do
the scrapbook? I went on my honeymoon a few months ago. Sitting on
my table in my den are still spread out all the pictures from the
honeymoon and the photo album and they haven't gone in yet. Probably
five years from now they'll be in a box somewhere still not put in.
So we say, okay, we can add to that. So now we're looking at - take
your pictures. When you get them developed, get the developer just to
put them on line or you can take them and we'll put them on line, store
them on line and just drag them and put them in your e-mails, put your
own scrapbooks together on line and keep it all organized there. Now
that's a real element of convenience.
What are the other issues? When you turn on your computer, just have
AOL come up. One of the complaints you have from people today is,
you know, I really just want to go on line _ that's my primary use _ but
I have to wade through all this other stuff to get there. That's going to
become a lot more simple.
But again, there's a lot of functionality in AOL that people don't know
about. And a big part of our challenge is to get them to understand
what it is and the value it has for them.
ADAM SMITH: What do you want people to know that they don't
know now?
BOB PITTMAN: Instant message. Everyone knows instant message.
I can't tell you how many people_ you know, I see them in New York
or somewhere, and they say, ooh, I just love AOL. What's your screen
name? And I'll write it down and put it on my buddy list. I see them on
line. It pops up in buddy list and I send them an instant message.
They're shocked.
ADAM SMITH: What is instant message as opposed to e-mail?
BOB PITTMAN: Instant message is, and if you're on AOL you get a
little box called the buddy list. You add in anybody's screen name you
want to and every time they're on line it will be in this box. It will appear
that they're on line. And there's a little button down there that says
``IM'' for instant message. You click on it and suddenly a little box
comes up. It's got their name tagged in it and you type them a message,
push the button and send.
Whatever they're doing, in front of them comes this thing _ bing! ``Hi.
What are you doing?'' And you respond. You type back and you and I
can carry on a conversation in a little box while you're doing other
things on line.
ADAM SMITH: [voice over] Bob Pittman is a minister's son, so it's
no surprise that he's effective at preaching the gospel according to
AOL. But his timing also seems to be right.
BOB PITTMAN: I'm the lucky guy. I came in once the brand was
built. I came in just as the company was ready to go into profit. The
great genius Steve Chase had here was when everybody else was
talking to technology people, Steve was building a mass market brand.
[Graphic: AOL - Time On Its Side
Daily average use per subscriber:
December 1997 - 42 minutes
December 1996 - 14 minutes
Source: AOL]
[Back to Top]
On the Spot
ADAM SMITH: Coke and Pepsi have been battling it out for years in
every corner of the globe. But how do you fight the cola wars if you're
number three? Royal Crown Cola has a new TV spot from the agency
Blum Herbstreith and a new look.
In a moment, Bob Garfield of Ad Age magazine will give his
unvarnished verdict. But first, creative director Alan Blum, who created
the commercial, is On the Spot.
ALAN BLUM, Blum Herbstreith: The commercial is a day in the
life, really, of America. The brand is an American icon. It dates back to
the turn of this century. It is one of the_ it's the third cola brand. And it's
decidedly American in the face of two cola giants who have kind of
given up their American-ness to kind of take a bigger world view. We
wanted to re-explore America and to redefine it for today.
The image of the motorcycle going down the highway was a real_ an
attempt at representing freedom and the excitement of an open road.
The girls waving at the Fourth of July parade _ very American, very
kind of true to our small town values as a country. The shot of the oil
workers at the end of a hard day in the oil field, coming off of, you
know, the sweat, the red heat of the earth and kind of drinking an RC.
Again, a freedom to experience the end of a work day.
ADAM SMITH: Bob, let's take a look at Alan Blum's commercial.
[Excerpt from RC Cola commercial.
SINGER: Homecoming queens with a twinkle in their eye. RC Cola
and Fourth of July. It's a choice we're given, it's the life we're living.
Right on to freedom's clear blue sky.
ANNOUNCER: It's as basic as red, white and blue. The freedom to
choose the taste that's right for you. It doesn't get more American than
that. So be free, drink RC.]
ADAM SMITH: It certainly sounds like Bob Dylan on the sound
track, doesn't it?
BOB GARFIELD, AD AGE Magazine: Yeah. It sounds like
someone trying to sound like Bob Dylan.
ADAM SMITH: So somebody sounding like that. It's certainly
American, isn't it?
BOB GARFIELD: Yeah, it is. And, in fact, Adam, my first impulse
was to despise this commercial because of its pointed American-ness. I
mean, I just_ the idea of just wrapping yourself in the American flag and
saying that's why you should buy my product always truly upsets me on
a visceral level. But after I got done being angry at this commercial, I
thought, you know, this is really, really smart for RC Cola.
ADAM SMITH: Because?
BOB GARFIELD: Well, because their competition is Coke and
Pepsi. And Coke and Pepsi outspend them probably 100 to 1 in the
United States. But Coke and Pepsi have become such global brands
that they have ignored their American-ness. They're trying to be all
things to all people, all over the world. And they have ceded their
American soda pop-ness to RC Cola, if it wants to take it. And they're
saying, well, if it's there for the taking we'll take it and we will be the
American cola. And I think they've done a very good job of this, even
getting the notion of freedom to choose in there.
ADAM SMITH: Freedom to choose.
BOB GARFIELD: You don't have to drink Coke and Pepsi, this is
America. No one is forcing you to_
ADAM SMITH: To drink Coke and Pepsi. It might be hard to find
the RC Cola.
BOB GARFIELD: They're forcing you actually to take Coke or Pepsi
because if you try to find RC Cola in the supermarket, it's not so easy.
ADAM SMITH: Do people want to drink the American cola, per se?
BOB GARFIELD: I think that that will be resonant to some people in
some places. Look, the soft drink business is fundamentally a
distribution game and it has almost nothing to do with who has the most
interesting advertising.
ADAM SMITH: But now in the conference rooms of the ad agencies
of the 800-pound gorillas do they then come back and wave the
American flag a little and say, yes, we are American?
BOB GARFIELD: No. There's nobody at Pepsi-Cola or at
Coca-Cola USA who is paying the slightest bit of attention at all.
[Back to Top]
In Focus
ADAM SMITH: Retailing on the Internet is one of the fastest moving
parts of the money game. And nowhere is change coming faster than in
the world of book publishing. The on-line book store, Amazon.com,
has been an overnight sensation. What could it mean for individual
authors and their prospects? My correspondent John De Natale has
that story In Focus.
JOHN De NATALE, Correspondent: [voice over] A display in the
front of the bookstore. For author Doug Cooper, it's as good as it gets
_ a great chance to reach readers and sell his new novel, Delirium.
[on camera] This cozy bookstore environment is being challenged by a
new one on the Internet. And that's turning a page for publishers and
some authors.
DOUG COOPER, Author: I was just a starving novelist living in
Paris. My first book had just been sold and was about to come out.
And I decided to serialize this novel on the Web.
JOHN De NATALE: [voice over] Cooper decided to create a buzz
in cyberspace.
DOUG COOPER: [reading] In attempting to attain his goals_
JOHN De NATALE: He published all but the last chapter of his book
on the Web. Cooper points out that there's nothing new about
serializing a novel.
DOUG COOPER: [on camera] This is how Dickens published his
work. It's how Dostoevsky published his work. And I like the idea that
I was using this fabulously intricate technology to throw novel writing
back, 200, 300 years.
JOHN De NATALE: Defying long odds, it worked.
DOUG COOPER: I was reaching more readers per week with this
novel on the Web than my first novel, which was a bestseller, reached
in three years of publication.
JOHN De NATALE: It helped that Time Warner put the chapters on
its popular Pathfinder Web site. But the clincher was the little hyperlink
down at the bottom of the page.
DOUG COOPER: You can actually click on a button on the first page
and it will take you to Amazon.com, to the very page on which can
purchase my novel _ cheesy, but very effective.
JOHN De NATALE: The Amazon.com bookstore is one of the
Internet's biggest retail success stories. Without one bookshelf, Amazon
took on a giant. Bill Bass covers Internet companies for Forrester
Research.
BILL BASS, Forrester Research: Last year, they sold about $150
million worth of books. And when the investment community looked at
this and Amazon went public, their valuation ended up being roughly
$400 million.
At that same time, Barnes & Noble, which is one of the two dominant
players in the traditional bookselling business _ they sell over $2 billion
worth of books a year _ their valuation was only about a billion dollars.
JOHN De NATALE: It was David and Goliath, but Barnes & Noble
didn't fall down and die. Instead, the giant entered the Internet arena.
And that's how Doug Cooper found his book linked to two booksellers
online.
[on camera] So is a place on the Web as valuable as a place on the
bookshelf?
DOUG COOPER: A hardcover book has the life of a vegetable. It
sits on the shelf about as long as that and then disappears. Delirium is
selling extremely well in bookstores, but I would predict that most of
the copies got sold online.
BILL BASS: Online you can have an endless inventory. You didn't
have to fit all these books into a brick and mortar store.
JOHN De NATALE: [voice over] And that means not only literary
stars get attention. And the Web is bringing about another change to the
book industry.
Recently, the German media conglomerate, Bertelsmann A.G.,
announced plans to buy Random House and bring the distinguished
publisher online. Publishers bypassing bookstores? Authors creating
on-line buzz to hawk their own books? Will technology kill the
bookstore? Well, to meet the challenge, bookstores like Barnes &
Noble are trying to change.
BILL BASS: You go in and you have the cafes and you're hanging
out, you're meeting people. They've become big meat markets because
if you just want to buy the book, you're easier going to the Internet.
JOHN De NATALE: [voice over] And what would Dickens think?
DOUG COOPER: I can fully imagine him serializing a book on the
Internet.
[Graphic: Amazin' Amazon.com
Bar graph: 1997 1st quarter - under $20 million;
2nd quarter - under $40 million;
3rd quarter - under $60 million;
4th quarter - under $80 million;
1998 1st quarter - under $100 million.]
[Back to Top]
Personal Best
ADAM SMITH: Many of you have written to us about your 401(k)
plans and how to allocate your portfolio to minimize risk and maximize
returns. The letter I've chosen this week comes from Lisa Quezada of
New York City. ``Given the volatility of small cap stocks,'' she asks,
``should they be in my 401(k)? Is it worth the risk for the potential
higher payoffs?''
Lisa, your signed copy of my book, The Money Game, is in the mail.
And with me now to answer Lisa's question is Lynn Brenner of
Bloomberg Personal magazine and author of Smart Questions to Ask
Your Financial Advisers. Lynn is here to help improve your money
game and turn your performance into a Personal Best.
Lynn, should Lisa have small caps in her 401(k)?
LYNN BRENNER, Bloomberg Personal: Yes, I think she should. I
think she's lucky to have that as an option because most companies still
don't offer a small cap fund as a choice in their 401(k) menu. It's true,
she's right, they are more volatile than big cap stocks. But in a
long-term investment like a 401(k) plan, volatility is much less of a
concern than it would be in a short-term investment. And I think she
ought to diversify among her stock holdings in the 401(k). She ought to
own small caps and big caps and some international stocks, too.
ADAM SMITH: What would the right percentages for small caps be?
LYNN BRENNER: I would divide it maybe two-thirds big cap,
one-third small cap of the U.S. stock holdings.
ADAM SMITH: If you have a 401(k) and you get your company's
stock in your 401(k), what do you do with that?
LYNN BRENNER: Well, some companies actually don't let you
transfer it into anything else. They insist that you hold it in company
stock until you retire. And it's certainly nice to get stock as a match. I
would be careful about contributing my own money into the company's
stock too. If you're getting the match_
ADAM SMITH: Too much of one thing?
LYNN BRENNER: Yeah, too much of one thing; not having all your
eggs in one basket.
ADAM SMITH: What are some of the trends in 401(k)s now?
LYNN BRENNER: Well, 401(k)s are actually a very big business
today. There's more than a trillion dollars invested in these plans.
ADAM SMITH: In 401(k)s?
LYNN BRENNER: In 401(k)s. The average 401(k) account now is
$65,000 and a lot of people have more. And what employers are doing
is broadening the menu. They're offering more selection; funds of more
than one fund family, for example. And they're also offering institutional
funds. Retail offerings are not the only thing in a 401(k) plan now. You
can have institutional funds which normally serve corporate buyers and
therefore their pricing is wholesale, which is very nice.
ADAM SMITH: And aren't some companies sending employees to a
sort of 401(k) school or is that just an exaggeration?
LYNN BRENNER: No, no. I don't think it is an exaggeration.
There's an awful lot of educational material provided to employees
today, including seminars. And in some cases, and this is the latest
trend, you can actually buy investment advice in your 401(k) from a
third party, not your employer, not the investment manager, for a
couple of hundred dollars a year you can get somebody telling you
which funds_ which specific funds in your plan you ought to invest in.
ADAM SMITH: You mean, you've mailed them in what you like or
what your personal needs and characteristics are and they mail you
back or e-mail you back what you ought to buy.
LYNN BRENNER: It tends to be on computer. And, yes, you fill out
a questionnaire. You tell them your preferences and you give them a
look at your whole financial picture and they advise you.
ADAM SMITH: So if they offer it, you should do it.
LYNN BRENNER: Yes, I think that's a good thing to take.
[Graphic: Lynn Brenner's 401(k) facts:
*Percent of big companies (with over 1,000 employees) that have a
401(k) plan _ 80%
*Percent of small companies (with fewer than 50 employees) that have
a 401(k) plan _ 10%]
[Graphic: Lynn Brenner's 401(k) facts:
*Number of options in the average 401(k) plan _ 7
*Percent of big and mid-sized companies including their own stock as
an option in their 401(k) plans _ 37%]
ADAM SMITH: What question would you like answered to help you
do your personal best in the money game? Get in touch with our e-mail
address, Letters @ Adamsmith.net. Or write to us the old-fashioned
way at Adam Smith's Money Game, 885 Third Avenue, Suite 2800,
New York, New York 10022. We'll be answering your questions on
the air and if we choose your question, I'll be sending you a signed
copy of my book, The Money Game.
Recently, Citicorp announced it was buying Travelers, creating a
financial juggernaut. And two other megabanks announced they are
buying other giant banks. Is this good? Will the customers and the
shareholders be happy? That of course depends on how they're
managed. But is there anything wrong with sheer size? Yes. When you
get an institution this size it becomes too big to fail. If Citi Travelers
were ever to get into trouble, there would be nobody that size to bail it
out. You and I would become the rescue team _ and the other
taxpayers _ because the moral hazard, risk, is missing from this deal
that is too big to fail.
And now a Money Game future. Be sure not to miss my exclusive
conversation with the greatest investor of them all _ Warren Buffett,
coming later this month.
I'm Adam Smith, see you next week as the Money Game continues.
ANNOUNCER: For more of the Money Game, visit us in cyberspace
at www.adamsmith.net.
ANNOUNCER: This program is made possible by a grant from
MetLife with over $330 billion in assets under management. Funding
has also been provided by the Roy R. and Marie S. Neuberger
Foundation.
CREDITS
Editor-in-Chief ADAM SMITH
Executive Producers PETER FOGES and ROBERT J. GELINE
Executive in Charge of Production DOUGLAS P. SINSEL
Associate Producer ELIZABETH D. DEWEY
Produced by ADAM SMITH EDUCATIONAL PRODUCTION
LTD. AND ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL LLC.
Footage provide by:
Century 21
MTV Networks
Thanks to:
Royal Crown Company
Special thanks to:
Bloomberg: A provider of news and information services
worldwide.
3-D Models Provided in Part by 3-D CAFE
For a VHS cassette send $19.95 or $5.00 for a printed transcript to:
Adam Smith's Money Game
800-All-News
1535 Grant Street
Denver, CO 80203
Rush, e-mail or fax charges by credit card, call 1-800-ALL-NEWS.
Copyright _ 1998 Adam Smith Educational Productions Ltd.
The name Adam Smith and the logo of Adam Smith are marks Registered in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Copyright ©2000 Adam Smith Educational Productions Ltd. |
|